February 28, 2018

“Private sector” of the Russian Invasion

Pro-Russian separatists of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic sit atop a self-propelled gun during the Victory Day parade in Donetsk on May 9, 2015.
Pro-Russian separatists of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic sit atop a self-propelled gun during the Victory Day parade in Donetsk on May 9, 2015.

Within the last four years, i.e. the period of direct aggression of Russia against Ukraine, the Russian private military companies (PMCs) have become an inseparable military attribute of the Kremlin’s policy aimed at pursuing its own agenda abroad, using the methods that are nowadays commonly regarded as hybrid.

Moscow’s current intensified involvement of the soldiers of fortune is defined by the following features:

  1. Involving Russian PMCs outside of the legal framework, both international and domestic.
  2. Ukrainian territories (the Crimea and Donbas) have become the basic training ground for teaching the mercenaries from the Russian PMCs to resolve specific issues related to the hybrid occupation of the Ukrainian territories, and preparing them for involvement on other theatres of war (TOWs). This first and foremost means Syria, in which Russian expansion officially started before the annexation of the Crimea using the resources of PMCs in particular, but their active involvement in the Syrian TOW has become possible as a result of practicing relevant tasks to perfection in Ukraine.
  3. The status of Russian PMCs: militants of the units in question (“mercenaries”, “contracted soldiers”, “soldiers on leave”) are the de facto regular personnel or agencies of structural (front) units of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces (GRU). This is why any kind of division of Russian troops into PMCs and regular forces can be considered as incorrect and imposed upon by the Russian propaganda. Hereby the fact that PMCs are sponsored by the oligarchs in the immediate circle of V. Putin (Prigozhin, Malofeev) perfectly fits into the specifics of the operations of the Russian intelligence organisations aimed at furnishing cover for criminal military syndicates.
  4. The preceding clause does not negate contradictions among the Russian security officials with regard to the activities of PMCs, both along the line of the GRU and the Ministry of Defence and along the line of the GRU and the Federal Security Service.

Since 2014, the participation of Russian militants belonging to entities officially known as PMCs has been observed both in the Crimea and in the east of Ukraine: PMC Wagner, E.N.O.T., Moran Security Group, Cossacks, Tiger Top Rent security, МАR.

PMC Wagner has become the most numerous and fundamental private Russian military company taking part in Russian hybrid operations in Ukraine and Syria (Syria – the Crimea – Donbas – Syria).

One theory is that the PMC Wagner has become the successor of the notorious Slavonic Corps Limited, which put in an appearance in a number of operations aimed at the protection/forceful taking of oil deposits on the territory of Syria in 2013. Essentially it ceased to exist in late 2013 after a conflict with the Federal Security Service and the arrests of its most active participants and leaders in Russia (in spite of the fact that the Slavonic Corps Limited was officially registered in Hong Kong). However, quite soon this unit was reanimated under the command of Dmitry Utkin, the officer of the GRU who started using Wagner as his code name. By the way, having been officially dismissed from service in the rank of a lieutenant colonel, he was performing a contract in the Moran Security Group, including on the territory of Syria in autumn 2013. Thus, the unit that is currently referred to as PMC Wagner started to accumulate mercenaries from different fringe organisations listed above, under the operational command of the GRU (to accomplish specific missions in the Crimea, and later on also in Donbas and Syria).

The following activities should be emphasised among the specifics of operations of the PMC Wagner (this name has been given to it by the media, since this unit is not registered anywhere legally, explicitly, and officially):

  • active participation in the annexation of the Crimea (blocking and disarming the Ukrainian troops) and military operations in Donbas (the assault of the Luhansk International Airport, military operations in Debaltseve)
  • rallying and training the staff with a clear tie-in to training camps near or on the base of the units of the Main Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, among which the base of the 10th Special Purpose Brigade of the Special Forces of the GRU in the locality of Molkino (Krasnodar Krai) should be pointed out
  • accomplishing specific tasks (mainly in Luhansk Oblast on the territory of the so-called LNR) related to mopping-up after pro-Russian militants subject to independent actions, or covering up crimes on the territory of Ukraine: getting rid of A. Mozgovoy, the commander of the Prizrak brigade, Aleksander Bednov, or “Batman”, the officer of the 4th brigade of the so-called DNR, conducting a purge among the leaders of Cossack units, etc.
  • enlisting the most odious war criminals from among other volunteer units of explicitly nationalistic (fascist) essence, who have committed crimes on the territory of Ukraine, with their further dispatch to Syria. Hereby the Russian Nazi Aleksei Milchakov is worth of a special mention. He was the commander of the Rusich unit and in autumn 2017 made an appearance in Syria as a member of the PMC Wagner.

Thus the intensification of the Kremlin’s use of PMCs abroad has coincided with the annexation of the Crimea. As a consequence of the euphoria resulting from the “brilliant” (as the Kremlin saw it) Crimean Campaign, the Crimean model was projected onto other territories in the south-east of Ukraine, where Moscow miscalculated by not foreseeing the scale of resistance of the Ukrainians.

The PMC Wagner was actively involved in Donbas. After the 1st and 2nd military occupation corps (the structural units of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation) were formed on the temporarily occupied territories of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts, the process of seasonal migration of mercenaries from the PMC between Donbas and Syria started.

The last telling defeat of the Russian troops from the PMC Wagner by the American-Kurdish forces in Deir ez-Zor, Syria, and the subsequent discussion in the Russian State Duma about the recognition of PMCs in terms of legislation were all, in one way or another, the aftermath of the occupation of the Crimea in 2014, in which PMCs have played one of the key roles.

The current format of the war in Donbas, just like the format of the operations in Syria, make it impossible for the Kremlin to resolve the issue by means of PMCs alone. The legalisation of the latter in Russia will simplify the process of recruitment, training, involvement, treatment, and honourable burying (making publicly visible payments of benefits to their relatives) of the mercenaries patronised by PMCs for the Russian defence establishment down the line of the GRU. At the same time, it will cause additional problems connected with covering up military crimes.

In Ukraine, relevant measures have been taken to collect data about Russian war criminals acting on Ukrainian territory in the format of PMCs. The Security Service of Ukraine has identified over 1,500 people from PMC Wagner alone that have been involved in military operations in Ukraine and Syria.